Tuesday, May 12, 2015
Seek and Ye Shall Find
Though it would still be great to come up with our own list of Bible passages in which God tells us to be brave, to let go of our fears, and have confidence in God's power and provision, I did find this online today: 365FearNots.com
And yes, it has a new scripture to instill courage in our hearts every single day. I guess it doesn't make sense to invent what already exists. Enjoy and remember that fear, not doubt, is the opposite of faith. God has brought us into this world for something more than to become servants of fear and anxiety. 2 Timothy 1:7 really says it well, "For the Spirit God gave us does not make us timid, but gives us power, love and self-discipline."
Monday, May 11, 2015
Calling All Bible Readers/Scholars
I was making the point yesterday in my sermon that fear, not doubt, is the opposite of faith. And I mentioned reading that there are 365 verses from scripture that tell us to put away our fears and trust in God. Everything from "Be not afraid" to "have courage" to a divine version of "trust me on this." The word 'fear' or 'afraid' probably don't show up that often, so we can't simply plug our words into a electronic concordance and spit out all the relevant passages. Nevertheless, it would be a helpful project to gather one scripture verse for every day of the year that comforts our fears, challenges us to be brave, that promises us God's protection, and assures us of God's presence. It would be a wonderful way to combat all the low grade anxieties, secret fears, and subconscious suspicions that sneak into our minds and hearts a dozen times every day.
I challenge you to look through and gather your favorite passages that do just that and let's put together a collection of scripture passages that we can make available to the entire congregation (and beyond) to strength our faith and diminish our fears.
If we put our collective biblical wisdom to the test, I'm sure we can come up with a year long list in no time. If you interested, send your verses to me at Tim@andrew-umc.org. I'll post them on this blog as I get them. When we get to the magic number 365 we'll make it a permanent part of our web page.
In the meantime, crack those Bibles and get to it!
Wednesday, February 4, 2015
Analyst, Coach, or Active Disciple of Jesus?
I came across a thoughtful inspiration from Steve May's Preachinglife.com. Thought you might enjoy it, especially this week.
On the last day of December 1967, the Green Bay Packers and the Dallas Cowboys played one of the greatest games in NFL history: The Ice Bowl. It all came down to a gutsy call in the final sixteen seconds of play. Do you remember?Green Bay had the ball at the one. Down by three points. No time-outs. Third down. It was obvious what they needed to do: throw a pass to the end zone. If it's incomplete, kick a field goal and try to win in overtime.Or Green Bay could do something completely unexpected: run the ball. If the play works, they win. If not, time runs out and they lose.You know what happened. The risk paid off, the Packers won the game (and broke my heart), and Vince Lombardi looked like the genius that he was.Of course, had it not worked, every analyst and Packer fan in the world would have wanted to know: Why didn't you make the obvious call?Fast forward 37 years to last night's game.It came down to a play call in the final half-minute. If you watched the game, you know about it: Seahawks coach Pete Carroll chose to pass from the one yard line with less than a minute to go, even with one of NFL's best running backs in the lineup. Wilson's throw was intercepted and Seattle lost to New England.The call was immediately questioned in the booth and then ridiculed at length during the post game conversation. (One analyst called it "the worst play call in Super Bowl history.")Of course, had the play worked, those same analysts would be praising Carroll's courage and innovation while gushing about his legacy.That's why they -- the analysts -- have the easiest job in the world. They themselves have no goal-line decisions to make. They have only to applaud what succeeds and second-guess what doesn't -- while pretending they would have gotten it right, had the call been theirs to make.But it wasn't theirs to make, was it? That's because analysts (and fans like you and me) can only observe from the stands or the sofa. We'll never be the ones calling the plays or making things happen.Do you see where I'm going with this?In life, you can either be a leader or an analyst, but not both. You can be either a decision-maker or a second-guesser, but not both.If you choose to lead, maybe sometimes you'll look like a genius. Other times you'll look like you don't know what you're doing. That's the risk that leaders take.However, win or lose, being part of the action beats being a spectator every time.Paul tells us to run the race in order to win, because we strive for an eternal prize. [1 Corinthians 9:2-25]All through the day you are faced with opportunities to either lead or second guess. Which will you do?— Steve May
Friday, January 30, 2015
Frederich Buechner on Forgiveness
One of my all time favorite quotes by preacher/author Frederich Buechner. A nice summary of many of the things we've been talking about in our current sermon series on Forgiveness.
“To forgive somebody is to say one way or another, ‘You
have done something unspeakable, and by all rights I should call it quits
between us. Both my pride and my principles demand no less. However, although I
make no guarantees that I will be able to forget what you’ve done, and though
we may both carry the scars for life, I refuse to let it stand between us. I
still want you for my friend.’
“To accept forgiveness means to admit that you’ve
done something unspeakable that needs to be forgiven, and thus both parties
must swallow the same thing: their pride.
“This seems to explain what Jesus means when he
says to God, “Forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass
against us.” Jesus is not saying that
God’s forgiveness is conditional upon our forgiving others. In the first place,
forgiveness that’s conditional isn’t really forgiveness at all, just fair
warning; and in the second place, our unforgivingness is among those things
about us that we need to have God forgive us most. What Jesus apparently is saying is that the pride that keeps
us from forgiving is the same pride that keeps us from accepting forgiveness,
and will God please help us do something about it.
“When somebody you’ve wronged forgives you, you’re
spared the dull and self-diminishing throb of a guilty conscience.
“When you forgive somebody who has wronged you,
you’re spared the dismal corrosion of bitterness and wounded pride.
“For both parties, forgiveness means the freedom
again to be at peace inside their own skins and to be glad in each other’s
presence."
Monday, January 12, 2015
Ridiculous New Year Resolution
I've decided to start spelling my name in new ways.
It looks like Tiom is very possible.
Time is also very probable.
I'm very tempted to just go with lower case t. It says it all.
I have a signature that automatically attaches itself to the end of every email, but for whatever reason I always have the inclination to type out my first name. As if to say, "Hey you, this is me, Tim". The problem is that by the time I do that I'm essentially done communicating. I'm not paying close attention and I'm not a great typist anyway. So I end up sending things out under Tiom, Time, and occasionally just t. I like the lower case t. It's a cross. It's modest (no big capital). It's a nickname I get called by my wife, Sue's family on occasion.
Mostly, I'm relatively busy. When you get my email it says it comes from Tim and then describes the congregation I serve with the rest of the address. And then you start reading it and it becomes clear who I am. How important is it to get my own name 'right'?
I like to think that I'm a genuinely self-effacing person. Pastor yes, Reverend no. One of the Pastors at St. Andrew yes, Senior or Lead Pastor most of the time no. At the same time it matters that am a pastor or that I might be your pastor or that the church of Jesus has seen fit to ordain me or that the bishop has seen fit to appoint me to this congregation or that we have another pastor on staff who is a wonder to behold but for a variety of reasons follows my lead or at least it is clear that if there is a buck and it stops on his desk he is perfectly free to walk next door and put it on my desk. Those things matter and pretending they don't is a bit silly.
But I still think I'm going to change the spelling of my email sign off anyway. Mostly because I think it's kind of fun and maybe in a perverse way, funny. We'll pretend that it isn't necessarily a sign of sloppiness or carelessness on my part. I like to think of it as spicing the mundane up just a bit. Who knows who will be writing back when you email Tim? Could be Tom, Tin, or Time, or Tiom or even Tione. Or it could just be good old 't.' Let's just say it's an email wink--a chance for randomness and poor typing to conspire in order to chuckle a little "we both know who we're talking about, right?"
Just think of it this way, when you click 'reply' it will come back to me either way. Now some folks would feel compelled to add here about whether or not I will actually read what's in that reply. I choose not to be so cynical. Though I would suggest that if you really want to get my attention put 'Pastor Appreciation Gift' or 'iPad Air 2' in the subject line. That gets me every time.
It looks like Tiom is very possible.
Time is also very probable.
I'm very tempted to just go with lower case t. It says it all.
I have a signature that automatically attaches itself to the end of every email, but for whatever reason I always have the inclination to type out my first name. As if to say, "Hey you, this is me, Tim". The problem is that by the time I do that I'm essentially done communicating. I'm not paying close attention and I'm not a great typist anyway. So I end up sending things out under Tiom, Time, and occasionally just t. I like the lower case t. It's a cross. It's modest (no big capital). It's a nickname I get called by my wife, Sue's family on occasion.
Mostly, I'm relatively busy. When you get my email it says it comes from Tim and then describes the congregation I serve with the rest of the address. And then you start reading it and it becomes clear who I am. How important is it to get my own name 'right'?
I like to think that I'm a genuinely self-effacing person. Pastor yes, Reverend no. One of the Pastors at St. Andrew yes, Senior or Lead Pastor most of the time no. At the same time it matters that am a pastor or that I might be your pastor or that the church of Jesus has seen fit to ordain me or that the bishop has seen fit to appoint me to this congregation or that we have another pastor on staff who is a wonder to behold but for a variety of reasons follows my lead or at least it is clear that if there is a buck and it stops on his desk he is perfectly free to walk next door and put it on my desk. Those things matter and pretending they don't is a bit silly.
But I still think I'm going to change the spelling of my email sign off anyway. Mostly because I think it's kind of fun and maybe in a perverse way, funny. We'll pretend that it isn't necessarily a sign of sloppiness or carelessness on my part. I like to think of it as spicing the mundane up just a bit. Who knows who will be writing back when you email Tim? Could be Tom, Tin, or Time, or Tiom or even Tione. Or it could just be good old 't.' Let's just say it's an email wink--a chance for randomness and poor typing to conspire in order to chuckle a little "we both know who we're talking about, right?"
Just think of it this way, when you click 'reply' it will come back to me either way. Now some folks would feel compelled to add here about whether or not I will actually read what's in that reply. I choose not to be so cynical. Though I would suggest that if you really want to get my attention put 'Pastor Appreciation Gift' or 'iPad Air 2' in the subject line. That gets me every time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)